![]() |
![]() |
| Donate Online | July 29, 2010 | Printer-Friendly Version |

![]() |
Moyle right: use the $45 million for a tax cutThe Idaho Affiliate of the American Family Association
Friday, March 13, 2009
Bryan Fischer, Executive Director
MOYLE, BEDKE RIGHT ON TAX CUT
The unseemly and predictable bickering over what to do with Idaho’s “stimulus” money has begun in earnest. I’m guessing the main thing this money will “stimulate” will be some rather intense turf wars between public officials. Already the governor and the legislature are locked in a spitting contest over road construction, and State Superintendent Tom Luna and Governor Otter are at odds over education spending.
Idaho was on the cusp of some significant education reforms before the “stimulus” plan brought those discussions to a screeching halt. Included in the discussions: ending “tenure” for public school teachers and
making overdue cuts in education spending, which swallows up almost 2/3 of the state budget.I’ll side with the governor’s plan to replenish the state’s rainy day fund for education and to cut teacher’s salaries by five percent, the same cut state workers are taking, which is only fair and has the added benefit of enabling teachers to demonstrate their compassion by sharing the pain the bulk of Idahoans are experiencing in the downturn.
The bias of the Idaho Statesman is evident in its headline today, which screams, “Otter’s plan threatens kids’ time with teachers.” This is what now passes for objective journalism in today’s media, using a loaded word such as “threatens” in a story about the governor’s fiscal responsibility. It’s an opinion piece disguised as news. The headline could just as easily have read, “Otter’s plans for education money both prudent and fair.”
The Boise School District, by the way, is cutting 122 jobs, which simply serves as proof that cuts in education spending are in fact possible, even though the education establishment constantly tells us it can’t be done without dire consequences “for the children.”
Idaho has about $45 million in discretionary funds, which apparently we can “spend” anyway we choose. House Majority Leader Mike Moyle (right) and Assistant Majority Leader Scott Bedke want to return this $45 million to the taxpayers who are being forced to cough it up in the first place, returning it to them in the form of personal and corporate income tax cuts.
(Idaho’s corporate income tax rate, incidentally, is the highest in the Northwest, which is bad for business.
American companies are fleeing to Switzerland as we speak because of its low corporate tax rate. If Idaho wants to attract business, lowering the corporate tax rate is the place to begin.)The governor says such a tax cut will not spur job creation, but I’m afraid he is simply wrong about this. There is virtually nothing that can be done with that $45 million tax cut that will not be good for the economy, and this will have the added benefit of letting ordinary Idahoans decide what parts of the economy to stimulate rather than either the state or federal government.
Idahoans will either spend that $45 million or save it. If they spend it, the economy gets an immediate jolt, and those sectors of the economy that are providing services and goods Idahoans want will get the lift first. If they save it or use it to reduce debt, banks will have more money to lend, which opens up the credit pipeline and makes it possible for jobs to be both saved and created.
The governor oddly claims he knows better what to do with our money than we do, saying, “I believe if I were in business today and somebody gave me a tax break, you know what I’d do with that tax break? I’d put it in my pocket. I’d say, ‘I’m a little nervous about this economy, so I’m not going to invest it.’” Can’t have people hanging on to their own money, now can we?
It’s certainly surprising to hear a Republican governor with a reputation for fiscal conservatism say we can’t be trusted to use our own money more wisely than the government can, which is why I’m with Rep. Moyle and Rep. Bedke on this one.
Says Moyle, “Give it back to the people. It’s not very much, but it ought to go back to the people footing the bill.” May his tribe increase.
ONEROUS DAYCARE BILL PASSES SENATE 30-5
A bill which unfortunately will limit daycare choices and raise daycare costs passed the Idaho Senate yesterday 30-5. It faces an uncertain future in the House, which historically has been much more attuned to
the impact of legislation on ordinary Idaho families.One of our arguments is that state licensing is simply no guarantee of child health or safety. More proof comes from Arkansas, where, in a licensed daycare center, ten kids drank windshield wiper fluid yesterday after a staffer mistook it for Kool-Aid and put in the refrigerator. One of the children remains hospitalized today with measurable levels of methanol in his system, a highly toxic alcohol that can induce comas and cause blindness.
Kudos to Senators Russ Fulcher, Shirley McKague, Dean Mortimer, Monty Pearce and Melinda Smyser for their common-sense, family-friendly “No” vote.
In floor debate, Sen. Pearce (R-New Plymouth) said, “I think the parents are in charge and I think they should make those inspections...somehow we have raised children for thousands of years without this bill.”
Sen. Fulcher (R-Meridian) added, “To me, this adds to the list of extremely well-intentioned bills ... that add to government intrusion in an area where it doesn’t belong.”
NEWS FLASH: NO SUCH THING AS NUCLEAR WASTE
Here’s something you won’t hear from the Sierra Club: there is no such thing as nuclear waste. We don’t need Yucca Mountain. According to William Tucker, writing in today’s Wall Street Journal, only a foolish 1976 ban on nuclear reprocessing has created an artificial need for storage of “spent” fuel rods.
William Tucker points out that 12 ounces of U-235 is enough to power San Francisco for five years. There are no chemical transformations in the process and best of all, for our environmentally concerned friends worried about the belching of plant food into the air, no carbon-dioxide emissions.
After powering San Francisco for five years, 95% of a spent fuel rod is old U-238, nonfissionable material that
is found in granite tabletops and stone buildings and could be put right back in the ground whence it came. One percent of the earth’s crust is U-238. Of the other 5%, one-fifth is fissionable U-235, which can be recycled as fuel. Another one-fifth is plutonium, which again can be recycled as fuel.
Of the remaining three-fifths, much of it can be used as medical and industrial isotopes. Forty percent of all medical procedures involve some form of radioactive isotope, and we have to import all our tracer material from Canada since we’re sending all our stuff into hibernation at Yucca Mountain.
What’s left is all that needs to be stored, until some important use for it can be found. France – and how the left loves all things French! – completely reprocesses its recyclable material and, after generating 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy for the last 30 years, stores all the unused remains under the floor of a single room at La Hague (right, above).
Concludes Tucker, “So shed no tears for Yucca Mountain. Instead of ending the nuclear revival, it gives us the chance to correct a historical mistake and follow France's lead in developing complete reprocessing for nuclear material.”
IVA IN THE NEWS
Correction: The K-Mart incident, in which police forced a store to let a transgender male use the women’s dressing room, took place last summer. I gave the wrong time frame in yesterday’s Update. My apologies for any confusion.
If you value the work of the IVA, please consider a donation today. Information on how to donate, including making a secure online donation, may be found here. Thank you! BONUS BYTES
|
All Content Copyright Idaho Values Alliance © 2010. All rights reserved. Unauthorized Usage Prohibited. |